Contact Us Donate Site Guide
NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin
Print
NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin

Take Action

"Abstinence-only" programs could be coming soon to a school near you

Dr. George Tiller Memorial Award Nominations 2011

Stop Walker's War on Contraception

» more action alerts

Choice Headlines

8/2/2011
San Francisco takes on 'crisis pregnancy centers'

8/1/2011
Insurance coverage for contraception is required

7/22/2011
Record wave of anti-abortion laws

» more choice headlines

Press Releases

2/3/2012
Senator Vinehout Backpedals on Anti-Choice Women's Health Position; Considering a run for Governor, Vinehout misrepresents her record on women's health

» more press releases

Governor Doyle Defends Patients' Rights

Posted: 01/06/2006

Vetoes dangerous Misinformed Consent Bill, requiring doctors to give unscientific information to women seeking abortions

Madison, WI
– Today, Governor Jim Doyle vetoed the Misinformed Consent Bill, which would have mandated that doctors give coercive and medically insupportable information to patients.

The legislation was pushed by Republican legislators to further restrict women’s access to reproductive health care and medical privacy. In the current legislative session, conservatives have lead an attack on Wisconsin patients, introducing more than a dozen measures that jeopardize the health, safety, and privacy of Wisconsinites, particularly women.

“Once again, Governor Jim Doyle has stood up against those who seek to destroy our access to health care and information,” said Kelda Helen Roys, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin. “Wisconsinites are grateful that Governor Doyle has made increasing access to affordable, high-quality health care a priority, and that he has vetoed every Republican attempt to roll back patients’ rights.”

The Misinformed Consent Bill (2005 SB 138) would amend Wisconsin's current biased counseling and mandatory delay law to include additional misinformation. It would force doctors to coerce and misinform all women seeking to terminate their pregnancies regarding claims about fetal development that are not supported by the scientific community.

Health care providers spoke out against the bill during hearings, and the Wisconsin Medical Society opposed it because it would intrude upon the doctor-patient relationship. Dr. Ellen Hartenbach, a women’s cancer specialist, testified against the bill, saying it was unnecessary and not “created with appropriate empathy and theraputic intent.” Another family physician, Dr. Kathy Oriel, said the bill “compromises my ability to provide all of my patients with comprehensive care and accurate information.”

Proponents of similar bills have openly admitted that their true intent is to coerce women into carrying their pregnancies to term. “This bill is motivated not by concern for women's health, but by a desire to prevent women and doctors from making their own reproductive health care decisions,” said Roys.

# # #

Home | Take Action | Issues | In Our State | News | About Us | Support Us
Pregnant? Need Help? | Contact Us | Get E-mail Alerts | Privacy Policy

©NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin

©NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin