Contact Us Donate Site Guide
NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin
Print
NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin

Take Action

"Abstinence-only" programs could be coming soon to a school near you

Dr. George Tiller Memorial Award Nominations 2011

Stop Walker's War on Contraception

» more action alerts

Choice Headlines

8/2/2011
San Francisco takes on 'crisis pregnancy centers'

8/1/2011
Insurance coverage for contraception is required

7/22/2011
Record wave of anti-abortion laws

» more choice headlines

Press Releases

2/3/2012
Senator Vinehout Backpedals on Anti-Choice Women's Health Position; Considering a run for Governor, Vinehout misrepresents her record on women's health

» more press releases

President Bush now first in history to criminalize safe medical procedure

Modified: 11/05/2003

Pro-choice Wisconsinites expressed outrage today as President Bush signed the ‘Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003’ into law.

In doing so, President Bush is the first president in history to criminalize a safe medical procedure.

“President Bush’s actions today are emblematic of his Administration’s war on women,” said Courtney Emery, an organization spokesperson. “The President has signaled his belief that our government should make women’s most private medical decisions for them.”

Opposed by such reputable organizations as the American Medical Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the ban on so-called partial birth abortion is the first federal law in history to criminalize a safe medical procedure.

Contrary to popular perception, this legislation does not ban just one procedure. Rather, this broad ban covers a wide range of procedures, some used as early as the 12th week of pregnancy.

“‘Partial birth abortion’ is a political term, not a medical one, and anti-choice lawmakers have used such inflammatory rhetoric to deceive the American public about the true nature of this bill,” said Emery.

This ban does not include an exception to protect women’s health, even though the U.S. Supreme Court has stated that such an exception is constitutionally required.

“The lack of a health exception suggests that anti-choice lawmakers are so intent on hindering access to comprehensive reproductive health care that they are willing to ignore Supreme Court precedent,” said Emery. “This is a call to action. Americans who do not support interference in our most personal health care decisions will be heard at the polls.”

Home | Take Action | Issues | In Our State | News | About Us | Support Us
Pregnant? Need Help? | Contact Us | Get E-mail Alerts | Privacy Policy

©NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin

©NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin