Contact Us Donate Site Guide
NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin
Print
NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin

Take Action

Choice Cinema - If These Walls Could Talk

Breakthroughs for women in the Supreme Court --- Are you up to date?

Women's issues in the Supreme Court - Test Your Knowledge!

» more action alerts

Choice Headlines

8/31/2010
Birth-control funding still drives conservatives crazy

8/31/2010
Study on Forced Pregnancy: Help for Women Who Face Threat

8/31/2010
The Way to End Abortion… Just Ignore Roe

» more choice headlines

Press Releases

8/24/2010
NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin PAC Endorses Scott Hassett for Attorney General

8/20/2010
Pro-Choice Wisconsin PAC Announces 2010 Endorsements for State Legislature

7/19/2010
NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin PAC Endorses Tom Barret For Governor

» more press releases

A Federal Employee Expresses Outrage on Stupak

Posted: 11/19/2009

Source: RHRealityCheck.org & Ms. Magazine
By CAROL JOFFE, University of California

“Our medical experts have determined that your life was not in danger and you could have carried the pregnancy to term. And, by the way, you owe us $9,000.”

Her voice breaking, D.J. Feldman, a Washington, D.C. federal employee, recently spoke to the press about her struggles with her insurance company after she aborted a much-desired pregnancy because of a fetal diagnosis of anencephaly (the absence of a major portion of the brain, skull and scalp). The insurance would only cover abortion in the case of rape, incest or a threat to her life, so the fact that if Feldman had continued the pregnancy, it would have been both physically and emotionally grueling—resulting either in a fetal demise, a stillbirth, or a live birth of a newborn who would quickly die—had no effect on the insurance company’s decision.

The primary culprit in this situation is not really Feldman’s insurance carrier, however, but the U.S. Congress. For decades it has imposed such unconscionable restrictions on abortion coverage for federal employees, as well as on women in the military, Native Americans using government provided health facilities and women on Medicaid in a majority of states.

Feldman is speaking out now because of her outrage that the notorious Stupak-Pitts amendment to the House health reform measure would extend such federal bans on abortion coverage to the millions of women who are enrolled in the private insurance market. Under this amendment, any insurance plan that wishes to be part of the new national health-care exchange would be prohibited from offering abortion coverage, although most insurance plans currently offer this coverage.

As Nancy Northrup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, which organized the press conference at which Feldman spoke, put it: “The ban on abortion coverage represents an enormous and unprecedented incursion into the terms of the private insurance market….Stupak-Pitts would regulate abortion coverage for people working for private employers or those who are self-employed.”

Click here for full text

Home | Take Action | Issues | In Our State | News | About Us | Support Us |
Pregnant? Need Help? | Contact Us | Get E-mail Alerts | Privacy Policy

©NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin

©NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin